Effect of different children’s toothpastes on compomer surface roughness: An in vitro study

Pınar Sadioğlu1image, Betül Kıcanaoğlu2image, Derya Doygun3image, Zeynep Ökte4image

Highlights

The type of toothpaste used in
pediatric patients may influence the surface integrity of restorative
materials.

Reduced surface roughness may
contribute to decreased plaque
accumulation and lower risk of
secondary caries.

The use of herbal- and fluoridecontaining
toothpastes may improve
the long-term durability and aesthetic stability of restorations.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effects of different children’s toothpastes on the surface roughness (Ra) of compomer materials under conditions simulating one year of toothbrushing. Methods: A total of 80 disc-shaped specimens prepared from a Dentsply Sirona compomer  material were polished and randomly assigned to five groups (n = 16): control (distilled water), Sensodyne Pronamel Kids, Chicka Chicka, The Humble Co. Kids, and Weleda Kids. Baseline surface roughness (Ra) values were recorded using a profilometer. Toothbrushing was performed using a brushing simulation in accordance with ISO standards, and postbrushing Ra measurements were obtained under identical conditions. Data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Intergroup comparisons were conducted with the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by the Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc test when appropriate, while intragroup comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon test. The primary outcome variable was defined as ΔRa (α = 0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences were observed among the groups in terms of absolute Ra values at baseline or after brushing (p > 0.05). In all groups, Ra values showed a significant increase after brushing in intragroup analyses (p < 0.001). A significant difference was detected among the groups with respect to ΔRa values (p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses revealed that the increase in ΔRa was significantly higher in the Sensodyne Pronamel and Chicka Chicka groups compared with the control, The Humble Co. Kids, and Weleda Kids groups. Conclusions: Toothbrushing increased the surface roughness of compomer materials in all groups, with toothpaste formulation playing a determining role in this change. The Humble Co. Kids and Weleda Kids groups demonstrated more limited surface alterations in compomer restorations, as indicated by lower ΔRa values.

Keywords: Compomers; Surface Properties; Toothbrushing; Toothpaste

Author Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Türkiye
    Department of Pediatric  Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Türkiye (Correspondence:dtpinarsadioglu@gmail.com)
  2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Türkiye
    Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Türkiye
  3. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Türkiye
  4. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Türkiye
  1. Dentistry SoP, Health O. Preventive oral health intervention for pediatricians. Pediatrics 2008;122:1387-1394
  2. Han SY, Chang CL, Wang YL, Wang CS, Lee WJ, Vo TTT, et al. A narrative review on advancing pediatric oral health: comprehensive strategies for the prevention and management of dental challenges in children. Children (Basel) 2025;12:286
  3. Van der Weijden G, van Loveren C. Mechanical plaque removal in step-1 of care. Periodontol 2000 2023;92:47-63
  4. Kaneyasu Y, Shigeishi H, Niitani Y, Takemoto T, Sugiyama M, Ohta K. Manual toothbrushes, self-toothbrushing, and replacement duration to remove dental plaque and improve gingival health: a scoping review. J Dent 2024;148:105240
  5. Sanz M, Serrano J, Iniesta M, Santa Cruz I, Herrera D. Antiplaque and antigingivitis toothpastes. Monogr Oral Sci 2013;23:27-44
  6. Ganss C, Möllers M, Schlueter N. Do abrasives play a role in toothpaste efficacy against erosion/abrasion? Caries Res 2017;51:52-57
  7. American Dental Association. Toothpastes. 2025. Available from: https://www.ada.org/resources/ada-library/oral-health-topics/toothpastes
  8. Singla MG, Virdi I. Abrasive action of different herbal toothpastes: a profilometric analysis. J Dent Res Rev 2021;8:312-316
  9. Athawale R, Srinath S, Chowdary C. Comparative evaluation of enamel abrasivity of different commercially available dentifrices: an in vitro study. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent 2018;16:78-82
  10. Kengadaran S, Anusha D, Baskar K, Muthukrishnan K, Pooraninagalakshmi J, Prabakar J. Comparative effectiveness of herbal and conventional toothpaste on prevention of dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2022;33:332-337
  11. Mehta V, Shetiya SH, Kakodkar P, Janakiram C, Rizwan SA. Efficacy of herbal dentifrice on the prevention of plaque and gingivitis compared to conventional dentifrice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2018;22:379-389
  12. Mazumdar M, Chatterjee A, Majumdar S, Chandrika M, Patki P. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of complete care herbal toothpaste in controlling dental plaque, gingival bleeding and periodontal diseases. J Homeop Ayurv Med 2013;2:124
  13. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater 2011;27:29-38
  14. Kyoizumi H, Yamada J, Suzuki T, Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Sasaki K. Effects of toothbrush hardness on in vitro wear and roughness of composite resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:1137-1144
  15. Da Costa J, Adams-Belusko A, Riley K, Ferracane JL. Effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2010;38:e123-e128
  16. International Organization for Standardization. Dentifrices—requirements, test methods and marking. Geneva: ISO; 2017. ISO 11609:2017
  17. Poonacha K, Deshmukh S, Deshpande AN, Shah R. Comparative evaluation of abrasive effect of three commercially available children’s toothpastes in India on glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2023;6:118-123
  18. Yilmaz N, Avci G, Ozkaya S, Tüzüner T, Baygin O. Comparison of the abrasive effects of children’s toothpaste on glass ionomer cement. Pediatr Dent J 2021;31:145-151
  19. Altinsoy GO, Ceyhan D. Effects of five different toothpastes on remineralization and surface roughness of primary tooth enamel with artificial initial caries. Appl Sci 2024;14:7232
  20. Passos V, Sousa R, de Melo M, Gomes E, Santiago S, Lima J. In vitro effect of children’s toothpaste on brushing abrasion of eroded primary enamel. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2021;22:157-162
  21. Arat EM, Özmen B, Altun C. Çocuk diş macunlarının süt dişi mine yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkisinin in vitro olarak değerlendirilmesi. Ataturk Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg 2016;26:1-6
  22. Uysal S, Öz FT. Süt dişi başlangıç mine lezyonlarının remineralizasyonunda farklı yapıdaki diş macunlarının mikrosertlik üzerine etkisinin in vitro değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J 2022;9:533-539
  23. Mondelli RFL, Wang L, Garcia FCP, Prakki A, Mondelli J, Franco EB, et al. Evaluation of weight loss and surface roughness of compomers after simulated toothbrushing abrasion test. J Appl Oral Sci 2005;13:131-135
  24. International Organization for Standardization. Dental materials—guidance on testing of wear—part 1: wear by toothbrushing. Geneva: ISO; 2007. ISO/TR 14569-1:2007
  25. Heintze SD, Forjanic M. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro. Oper Dent 2005;30:617-626
  26. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr. Influence of storage regime prior to abrasion on surface topography of restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;65:227-232
  27. Wang L, Garcia FCP, de Araújo PA, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:303-314
  28. Monteiro B, Spohr AM. Surface roughness of composite resins after simulated toothbrushing with different dentifrices. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:1-5
  29. Kim JH, Miletic V, Leprince JG, Park YS. Evaluation of relative dentin abrasivity in whitening toothpastes containing acids. Int Dent J 2024;74:1044-1052
  30. Enax J, Meyer F, Schulze zur Wiesche E, Fuhrmann IC, Fabritius HO. Toothpaste abrasion and abrasive particle content: correlating high-resolution profilometric analysis with relative dentin abrasivity. Dent J (Basel) 2023;11:79
  31. AlAli M, Silikas N, Satterthwaite J. Effects of toothbrush wear on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites with various matrix types. Dent J (Basel) 2021;9:8
  32. Neme A, Frazier KB, Roeder L, Debner T. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 2002;27:50-58
  33. Johannsen G, Tellefsen G, Johannsen A, Liljeborg A. The importance of measuring toothpaste abrasivity in both a quantitative and qualitative way. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:508-517
  34. Meseli S, Alkan E, Korkut B, Kanar O, Tagtekin D. Abrasiveness and bleaching level of toothpastes on composite resins: a quantitative analysis using a novel brushing simulator. Appl Sci 2025;15:2314
  35. Ferreira NMR, Lippert VF, Heck ABdS, Spohr AM, Kunrath MF, Feldens CA, et al. Surface roughness of composite resins subjected to brushing with whitening toothpastes: an in vitro study. Braz Oral Res 2025;39:e006
  36. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:265-273
  37. Hilgenberg SP, Pinto SCS, Farago PV, Santos FA, Wambier DS. Physical-chemical characteristics of whitening toothpaste and evaluation of its effects on enamel roughness. Braz Oral Res 2011;25:288-294

Article Info

Contemp Pediatr Dent 20263:7(1):110-121

Received: 17 January 2026

Accepted: 28 April 2026

Online First: 30 April 2026

2 views

Full Text

Attachments

Attachments

How to Cite

				
					Pınar Sadioğlu, Betül Kıcanaoğlu, Derya Doygun, Zeynep Ökte. Effect of different children’s toothpastes on compomer surface roughness: An in vitro study. Contemp Pediatr Dent 2026:7(1):110-121
				
			

Related Articles

Share Article

Under a Creative Commons license