Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of rotary and manual files for root canal instrumentation in primary teeth pulpectomies: A comparative randomized clinical trial

Original Research

Contemp Pediatr Dent 2021:2(1):21-34


Evaluation of the clinical efficiency of rotary and manual files for root canal instrumentation in primary teeth pulpectomies: A comparative randomized clinical trial

OrcidKL Girish Babu1 ✉, OrcidGuraj Hebbar Kavyashree2

Affiliations

1. Professor & Head, Department of Dentistry, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan-573201, India ( Correspondence: docgirish77@gmail.com)

2. Junior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan-573201, India


Highlights

The application of rotary endodontics is still new in pediatric dentistry. Rotary files manufactured primarily for permanent teeth are routinely used in primary teeth.

HERO Shaper rotary file systemis manufactured for permanent teeth but its design makes it convenient to use in primary teeth. Recently, Kedo-S pediatric rotary file system was introduced for use in primary teeth.

The rotary file systems showed superior obturation quality, decreased instrumentation time, and decreased obturation time compared to manual files.


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the instrumentation time, obturation time, quality of obturation, and clinical and radiological success of pulpectomized teethfollowing root canal preparation of primary molars with rotary and manual file system. Methods: A total of 150 primary molars requiring pulpectomy were selected from children aged four to seven years. These teeth were divided into three groups of 50 teeth each. In Groups 1, 2, and 3, cleaning and shaping were carried out with Kedo-S pediatric rotaryfiles, HERO Shaper rotary files, and manual NiTi K-files, respectively. Obturation was carried out with zinc oxide eugenol cement and an engine-driven Lentulo spiral. The instrumentation and obturation times were recorded. A radiographic assessment of thequality of the root filling was carried out immediately after obturation. Finally, the pulpectomized teeth were clinically and radiographically evaluated over a two-year period. Results: The mean instrumentation times for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 14.56 ± 2.89 min, 17.93 ± 3.51 min, and 29.00 ± 2.08 min, respectively. The mean obturation times for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 8.11 ± 1.7 min, 7.93 ± 1.3 min, and 9.64 ± 17.61 min, respectively. The mean difference in the quality of obturation was not statistically significant in primary molars instrumented with Kedo-S pediatricand HERO Shaper rotary file systems (p = 0.16). However, this mean difference was significant when compared between primary molar instrumented with rotary file systems and manual NiTi files (p = <0.001). At two years, the clinical success rate was 100% and the radiological success rates were 95.3%, 97.9%, and 89.5% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions: The rotary file systems took significantly less instrumentation and obturation time than the manual NiTi files. There were no significant differences in obturation quality or success rates after two years.

Keywords: Endodontic Obturation; Instrumentation;Pulpectomy; Root Canal Preparation


Copyright © 2021 Contemporary Pediatric Dentistry

References

1. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 1999;21:453-454

2. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:77-78

3. Moghaddam KN, Mehran M, Zadeh HF. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. Iran Endod J 2009;4:53-71

4. Hidsmann, M., Gressmann, G., Schafers, F. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642rotary NiTi instruments. Int Endod J 2003;36:358–366

5. Sonntag, D., Delschen, S., Stachniss, V. Root canal shaping with manual and rotary NiTi file performed by students. Int Endod J 2003;36:715–723

6. Bahrololoomi, Tabrizazadeh M, Salmani L. In vitro comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning capacity between rotary and manual pr eparation techniques in primary teeth. J Dent 2007;4:59-62

7. Katge F, Patil D, Poojari M, Pimpale J, Shitoot A, Rusawat B. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: An in vitro study. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32:311–316

8. Finn SB. Morphology of primary teeth. In: Finn SB, editor. Clinical Pedodontics 4th ed . Philadelphia: Saunders Co;1973.p.59-70.

9. Jeevanandan G. Kedo-S Paediatric Rotary Files for Root Canal Preparation in PrimaryTeeth – Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:3-5

10. Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, HaznedarogluF,Tanalap J, Bayirli G. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:636-64.

11. Subramaniam P, Girish Babu KL, Tabrez TA. Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;40:141-146

12. Subramaniam P, Tabrez TA, Girish Babu KL. Microbiological assessment of root canals following use of rotary and manual instruments in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;38:123-127

13. Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2018;19:273–278

14. Musale PK, Mujawar SAV. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014;15:113-120

15. Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2019;37:75-79

16. Lakshmanan L, Mani G, Jeevanandan G, Ravindran V, Subramanian EMG. Assessing the quality of root canal filling and instrumentation time using Kedo-s files, reciprocating files and k-files. Braz Dent Sci 2020;23:1-7

17. Divya S, Jeevanandan G, Sujatha S, Subramanian EMG, Ravindran V. Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth – A randomised clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res 2019;30:904-908

18. Juliet S, Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, Ravindran V, Subramanian EMG. Comparison Between Three Rotary Files on Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time in Primary Teeth − A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orofac Sci 2020;12:30-34.

19. Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2006;28:39-47.

20. Morankar R, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A, Bhatia SK. Manual versus rotary instrumentation for primary molar pulpectomies- A 24 months randomized clinical trial. Pedia Dent J 2020;28:96–102

21. Kuo C, Wang Y, Chang H, Huang G, Lin C, Li U, et al. Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent Sci 2006;1:10-15

22. Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T, Elliott MA, Schneider LG, Czonstkowsky M. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15:254-256

23. Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Pediatr Dent 2013;35:236-240

24. Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 1996;18:57- 63

25. Ozalp N, Saroğlu I, Sönmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent 2005;18:347-350

26. Romero TO, Gonzalez VM. Comparison be tween rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011; 35:359-364

27. Makarem Abbas, Ravandeh Navid, Ebrahimi Masoumeh. Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2014; 8:84-89

28. Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, Tanomaru JM. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child (Chic) 2004;71:45-47

29. Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32:295-298

30. Madan N, Rathnam A, Shigli AL, Indushekar KR. K-file vs ProFiles in cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in primary molar root canals: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:55-61

31. Moghaddam KN, Mehran M, Zadeh HF. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. Iran Endod J 2009;4:53-71

32. Babji P, Mehta V, ManjooranT. Clinical Evaluation of rotary system over manual system in deciduous molars: A clinical trial. Int J Pedod Rehabil 2019;4:13-16

33. Govindaraju L, Jeevanadan G, Subramaniam EM. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file system in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent 2017:11:376-379

34. Govindaraju L, Jeevanadan G, Subramaniam EM. Clinical evaluation of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using two modified rotary file systems with manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;77: 55-58

35. Chawla HS, Setia S, Gupta N, Gauba K, Goyal A. Evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide, calcium hydroxide, and sodium fluoride as a new root canal filling material for primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008;26:53-58

36. Fuks AB, Eidelman E, Pauker N. Rootfillings with endoflas in primary teeth: A retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002;27:41-45

37. Moskovitz M, Sammara E, Holan G. Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. J Dent 2005;33:41-47

38. Pandranki J, V Vanga NR, Chandrabhatla SK. Zinc oxide eugenol and Endoflas pulpectomy in primary molars: 24-month clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2018;36:173-180

39. Ramar K, Mungara J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials: An in-vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2010;28:25-29

40. Yacobi R, Kenny DJ, Judd PL, Johnston DH. Evolving primary pulp therapy techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:83-85

41. Machida Y. Root canal obturation in primary teeth: a review. Jap Dent Assoc J 1983; 36:796-802.

42. Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2004;14:417–424

Full Text


DOI

10.51463/cpd.2021.42


Views

141 views

Article Info

Received:

20 February 2021

Accepted:

19 April 2021

Online First:

22 April 2021