Comparative evaluation of qualitative and quantitative wear of 3D-printing materials and zirconia against primary tooth enamel: An in vitro study

Ritesh Kalaskar¹ image, Nidhi Sharma2 image, Utkarsha Kadam3 image, Snehal Jagtap4 image

Highlights

Three-dimensional printed crowns are increasingly applied in pediatric dentistry, offering esthetic and minimally invasive restorative options for primary teeth.

This study compared the qualitative and quantitative wear of 3D printing resins and zirconia against primary tooth enamel using standardized in vitro testing.

3D printing resins caused less antagonist enamel wear than zirconia, suggesting they are less abrasive and may be preferable for esthetic crowns in primary teeth.

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to address the gap in existing literature by evaluating the qualitative and quantitative wear of two three-dimensional (3D) printing materials against primary tooth enamel, in comparison with zirconia, a widely used esthetic crown material. Methods: Eighteen extracted primary canines were used as antagonists, and six blocks each of two 3D printing resins (Shining 3D and NextDent) and zirconia were fabricated. Wear testing was performed using a reciprocating tribometer under a 40 N load at 1.5 Hz with a 4 mm stroke length for 60,000 cycles. Pre- and post-test digital scans were analyzed in Geomagic Software using a superimposition technique to calculate volumetric wear, and surface changes were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA for quantitative comparison. Results: Shining 3D demonstrated the greatest material wear (0.51 mm³), followed by NextDent (0.27 mm³), while zirconia exhibited the least (0.13 mm³). Conversely, zirconia caused the highest antagonist wear (0.25 mm³), followed by NextDent (0.17 mm³) and Shining 3D (0.12 mm³), although these differences were not statistically significant. Distinct wear patterns were observed for each material. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, NextDent exhibited greater wear resistance than Shining 3D. Both 3D-printing resins produced less antagonist enamel wear than zirconia, underscoring their potential as promising alternatives in pediatric restorative dentistry. Further studies employing diverse materials and standardized protocols are required to validate these findings and enhance clinical translation.

Keywords: Dental Wear; Primary Tooth; Three-dimensional Printing; Zirconium

Author Affiliations

  1. Prof., Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College & Hospital, India

  2. PG Student, Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College & Hospital, India (Correspondence:nidssharma927@gmail.com)

  3. PG Student, Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College & Hospital, India

  4. PG Student, Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College & Hospital, India

  1. Aktaş N, Bankoğlu Güngör M. Evaluation of wear on primary tooth enamel and fracture resistance of esthetic pediatric crowns manufactured from different materials. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024;60:1678-1687
  2. Mobarak MH, Islam MA, Hossain N, Al Mahmud MZ, Rayhan MT, Nishi NJ, Chowdhury MA. Recent advances of additive manufacturing in implant fabrication – a review. Appl Surf Sci Adv 2023;18:100462-100470
  3. Sztyler K, Wiglusz RJ, Dobrzynski M. Review on preformed crowns in pediatric dentistry – the composition and application. Materials 2022;15:2081-2095
  4. Seale NS, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Dent 2015;37:145-160
  5. Rezvi FB, Mathew MG, Gurunathan D. Crowns in pediatric dentistry – a review. Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol 2021;25:2530-2539
  6. Helmy RH, Mohamed PA, Ibrahim YM, Eldokmak MM, Sedek EM, El-Naggar AI, Abdelkarim AA. A dental materials approach to pediatric dental full coverage: A review. Alexandria Dent J 2023;48:200-209
  7. Wadhwa S. Digital dentistry: an overview and future prospects. Br Dent J 2024;237:22-28
  8. Turker I, Kursoglu P. Wear evaluation of CAD-CAM dental ceramic materials by chewing simulation. J Adv Prosthodont 2021;13:281-288.
  9. Lynch RJ. The primary and mixed dentition, post-eruptive enamel maturation and dental caries: a review. Int Dent J 2013;63:3-13.
  10. Lee H, Son K, Lee DH, Kim SY, Lee KB. Comparison of wear of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of digital light processing 3D printing: a preliminary in vivo study. Bioengineering 2022;9:417-425.
  11. Mayer J, Stawarczyk B, Vogt K, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, Reymus M. Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:5987-5996.
  12. Prause E, Hey J, Beuer F, Schmidt F. Wear resistance of 3D-printed materials: a systematic review. Dent Rev 2022;2:100051-100060.
  13. Nisa ZU, Chuan LK, Guan BH, Ayub S, Ahmad F. Anti-wear and anti-erosive properties of polymers and their hybrid composites: a critical review of findings and needs. Nanomaterials 2022;12:2194-2205.
  14. Matzinger M, Hahnel S, Preis V, Rosentritt M. Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:725-737.
  15. Kessler A, Kapor S, Erdelt K, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, Syrek A, Güth JF, Kühnisch J. Two-body wear and fracture behaviour of an experimental paediatric composite crown in comparison to zirconia and stainless steel crowns dependent on the cementation mode. Dent Mater 2021;37:264-271.
  16. Möhn M, Frankenberger R, Krämer N. Wear and marginal quality of aesthetic crowns for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2022;32:273-283.
  17. Agrawal R, Khanduja R, Singhal M, et al. Clinical evaluation of stainless steel crown versus zirconia crown in primary molars: an in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15:15-19.
  18. Walia S, Salami AA, Bashir A. A randomized controlled trial of three aesthetic full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2014;15:113-118.
  19. Aly GMM, Ahmed DM, Saad NM. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of wear of primary enamel against three types of full coronal coverage. J Oral Health Dent Manag 2016;15:80-86.
  20. Alzanbaqi SD, Alogaiel RM, Alasmari MA, Al Essa AM, Khogeer LN, Alanazi BS, Hawsah ES, Shaikh AM, Ibrahim MS. Zirconia crowns for primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:2838-2848.
  21. Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:22-29
  22. Ajayakumar LP, Chowdhary N, Reddy VR, Chowdhary R. Use of Restorative Full Crowns Made with Zirconia in Children: A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13:551-558

Article Info

Contemp Pediatr Dent 2025:6(2):149-159

Received: 05 June 2025

Accepted: 15 August 2025

Online First: 28 August 2025

DOI: 10.51463/cpd.2025.30

114 views

Full Text

Attachments

Attachments

How to Cite 

				
					Ritesh Kalaskar, Nidhi Sharma, Utkarsha Kadam, Snehal Jagtap. Comparative evaluation of qualitative and quantitative wear of 3D-printing materials and zirconia against primary tooth enamel: An in vitro study. Contemp Pediatr Dent 2025:6(2):149-159

Related Articles

Share Article

Under a Creative Commons license
Tagged